roger corman how i made a hundred movies

They want more money or a better camera package or the ability to shoot over 2 months instead of 2 weeks. Too often filmmakers avoid making their movie because they’re waiting for the perfect time. There are a lot of lessons in this for independent filmmakers, not the least of which is the feasibility of creating a great movie with a highly restricted set of resources.

This resulted in arguably his most famous work - a film that has cemented itself in cinematic history with its cult-like status.

Roger and his team took three days to rehearse the film on set, and then two days to shoot it before the sets were town down. So if anyone could pull off a successful feature in 2 days, it would be him. And as history has showed us, clearly the experiment was a massive success… He had already shot many of his movies in as little as 5 or 6 days, the vast majority of which were profitable. The set was about to be demolished, but in the few days in between picture wrap and the set being taken down, Roger figured - why not just shoot another movie while the set is still up? I’ve always been fascinated by filmmakers who can produce incredible work even under intense time constraints. And no one has ever done it better than Roger Corman, who shot his most famous feature film - Little Shop Of Horrors - in just two days back in 1960.Īt the time, Roger had just wrapped up another film - A Bucket Of Blood - which was shot on a set on the studio lot. How Roger Corman shot his feature films in as little as 2 days. Your weekly dose of micro-budget filmmaking advice. How Roger Corman Shot His Feature Films In As Little As 2 Days

Roger corman how i made a hundred movies